Social Medicine and Medical Ethics · MU Plovdiv

26. Non-parametric tests. Rank tests. Pearson's chi-squared test. Fisher's exact test

Inside: 6 sections · 1 table · 4 formulas · 15 flashcards · 6 min

Topic 26 of 80 in the MU Plovdiv syllabus for Social Medicine and Medical Ethics (Medicine, Years 2 and 3). The free AceMed note covers it in 6 sections, about 853 words (6 min of reading), with 15 flashcards.

In this note

  1. Introduction
  2. Non-parametric tests: when and why
  3. Rank tests
  4. Pearson's chi-squared test
  5. Fisher's exact test
  6. Choosing the test and reporting the result

Introduction

This topic covers the distribution-free (non-parametric) tests used when the assumptions of parametric tests are not met, the main rank tests that replace them, and two tests for categorical data: Pearson's chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The key exam skill is choosing a correct test from the type of data, the study design, the number of groups and the sample size, and then interpreting the p-value correctly.

Non-parametric tests: when and why

Non-parametric tests make no assumption about the shape of the population distribution, such as normality, and do not estimate parameters like the mean or variance. They are used when data are ordinal, when the distribution is clearly skewed or has extreme outliers, or when the sample is too small to check normality. The cost is lower power when the parametric assumptions really hold, and the test answers a question about distributions or medians rather than about means.

  • Parametric assumptions that may fail: normal distribution, equal variances, interval or ratio measurement, adequate sample size.
  • Typical situations: scores or ranks, heavily skewed laboratory values, very small samples, data with extreme outliers.

Continue reading free

The whole note, all 6 sections, is free with an AceMed account, with its 15 flashcards. Premium adds flashcard recall, highlights and Ask AI.