Preclinics of Conservative Dental Medicine · MU Sofia

30. Indirect ceramic restorations (inlays) – indications, advantages, disadvantages, preparation, fabrication, cementation.

Covers ceramic inlays as intracoronal restorations bonded with resin cement, starting with the ceramic materials and comparing glass-ceramics with zirconia in a strength and etching table. It then moves through indications and contraindications, advantages and disadvantages, preparation dimensions, laboratory and chairside CAD/CAM fabrication, and a step-by-step adhesive cementation sequence with a flow diagram. It closes with common mistakes and key points.

Inside: 7 sections · 1 labelled picture · 1 table · 17 flashcards · 6 min

Topic 30 of 53 in the MU Sofia syllabus for Preclinics of Conservative Dental Medicine (Dental Medicine, Year 3). The free AceMed note covers it in 7 sections, about 877 words (6 min of reading), with 17 flashcards.

In this note

  1. Introduction
  2. Ceramic materials
  3. Indications, advantages and disadvantages
  4. Preparation
  5. Fabrication
  6. Adhesive cementation
  7. Key points

Introduction

Ceramic inlays are intracoronal restorations made outside the mouth – in the laboratory or chairside by CAD/CAM – and bonded into the cavity with resin cement. They are the most esthetic and wear-resistant tooth-coloured option for medium to large posterior cavities, but ceramic is brittle: it survives only if the preparation gives it enough bulk and the adhesive cementation is done without error. The inlay preparation rules shared with composite inlays belong to topic 29; this note covers what is specific to ceramics.

Ceramic materials

Inlay ceramics are either glass-ceramics (crystals in a glass matrix – translucent and etchable with hydrofluoric acid) or polycrystalline zirconia (no glass phase – very strong but opaque and not etchable).

Glass-ceramic inlays gain their strength from the bond to the tooth: they are etched, silanised and luted with resin cement – never with zinc phosphate or glass-ionomer cement.

Indications, advantages and disadvantages

Indications and contraindications

  • Medium to large Class I and II cavities in premolars and molars, where a direct composite would suffer from shrinkage, poor contacts and wear.
  • High esthetic demand, replacement of large amalgam or gold restorations, metal allergy.
  • Margins in enamel, supragingival or at the gingiva, where a rubber dam can be placed.
  • Bruxism, clenching, heavy occlusal load – fracture.
  • Deep subgingival margins – no isolation, no enamel to bond to, poor impression or scan.
  • Small cavities (direct composite is better), shallow cavities or short crowns without room for 1.5 mm of ceramic, thin weakened cusps (cover them – onlay); poor hygiene, high caries risk.

Advantages and disadvantages

  • Esthetics: enamel-like translucency and colour stability – no staining or ageing as in composite.
  • Wear resistance close to enamel; smooth glazed surface with little plaque; biocompatible and chemically inert.
  • Polymerisation shrinkage limited to the thin cement layer; contacts and anatomy shaped outside the mouth; the bonded inlay stiffens the remaining cusps.
  • Brittle: fractures when thin, notched or loaded before it is bonded.
  • Wears opposing teeth – mostly feldspathic porcelain left rough after adjustment.
  • Cost, technique-sensitive cementation, two visits and a provisional in the laboratory route; difficult to adjust, repair and remove; resin cement wears at the margins (marginal ditching).

Continue reading free

The whole note, all 7 sections, is free with an AceMed account, with its 17 flashcards. Premium adds flashcard recall, highlights and Ask AI.